RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Enfortumab vedotin (EV), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting Nectin-4, has been used for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) after progressing on checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Re-challenging chemotherapy with platinum agents and continuing CPIs beyond progressive disease (PD) have often been chosen following PD on CPIs, and several studies indicate favorable treatment effects of re-challenging chemotherapy. There is little evidence for comparing EV and re-challenging chemotherapy in real-world clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to reveal the real-world treatment outcomes of EV, re-challenging chemotherapy, and continuing CPIs beyond PD in mUC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional dataset of 350 mUC patients treated with CPIs was utilized. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) were evaluated to compare the treatment arms. RESULTS: One hundred and nine mUC patients were treated with EV with a median follow-up of 6.4 months. The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 48% and 70%, respectively. The OS from PD on pembrolizumab exhibited significant differences among the three groups, with a median OS of 8, 14, and 29 months in continuing pembrolizumab beyond PD, re-challenging chemotherapy, and EV, respectively. When comparing the survival outcomes from the initiation of the treatment, there is neither a difference in OS (p = 0.124), PFS (p = 0.936), nor ORR (p = 0.816) between EV and re-challenging chemotherapy. Notably, the DOR in patients who achieved an objective response was significantly longer in the EV group than the re-challenging chemotherapy group (a median of 11 and 5 months, p = 0.049). For OS, the difference was not statistically significant (27 and 11 months in EV and re-challenging chemotherapy, respectively: p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A superior effect of EV on patient survival compared to re-challenging chemotherapy and continuing pembrolizumab beyond PD was observed in our real-world analysis, which is attributed to the durable DOR in EV treatment despite the similar ORR to re-challenging chemotherapy.
Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibodydrug conjugate targeting Nectin-4 and is now utilized for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma following treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Until recently, repeating chemotherapy using platinum drugs or continuing CPIs were often the treatments used for these patients. In the present study, we reported real-world treatment outcomes, mainly focusing on EV and repeating chemotherapy. Although the objective responses to the treatments were comparable, the duration of response for patients responding to the treatment was significantly longer in patients treated with EV than in those repeating chemotherapy, resulting in extended survival time with EV treatment.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is well known that patients with objective response to pembrolizumab have a durable duration of response leading to favorable survival outcomes. We investigated the possibility of predicting the objective response with concise indicators obtained from daily clinical practice. Methods In our multi-institutional cohort, 220 platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinomas (mUC) treated with pembrolizumab for at least six weeks with complete information of objective response were investigated. Results The median follow-up was 7.3 months, and 119 patients deceased during the follow-up. A multivariate logistic regression analysis exhibited two independent variables predicting the objective response, including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) change at six weeks of treatment and liver metastasis. We proposed a risk group using these two indicators. Patients with no predictive indicators / one of those were assigned to favorable (42%) / intermittent (47%) risk groups. Patients with both indicators were assigned to poor risk (11%). Notably, the objective response rate was well delineated in 41%, 25%, and 0% for favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively (p<0.001). Distinct overall survival (OS) between the risk groups was also confirmed with the median OS of 14.1, 11.7, and 4.2 months in favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At the six weeks of the pembrolizumab treatment, our risk model predicts the objective response rate precisely. Notably, those classified as 'poor risk'-marked by liver metastasis and a heightened NLR-should be considered for alternative therapy with a different mode of action, highlighting a critical decision point in treatment optimization.
